Często zadawane pytania

Znajdź odpowiedzi na często zadawane pytania o URLP i nasze bezpłatne narzędzia deweloperskie online.

Pytania ogólne

Czym jest URLP?

URLP to bezpłatna kolekcja narzędzi deweloperskich online do kodowania, dekodowania i formatowania danych. Wszystkie narzędzia działają bezpośrednio w Twojej przeglądarce, zapewniając szybkie przetwarzanie i pełną prywatność. Żadne dane nie są wysyłane na nasze serwery.

Czy muszę utworzyć konto, aby korzystać z URLP?

Nie, wszystkie narzędzia są całkowicie bezpłatne i nie wymagają rejestracji ani tworzenia konta. Po prostu odwiedź narzędzie, którego potrzebujesz i zacznij z niego korzystać natychmiast.

Czy te narzędzia są naprawdę bezpłatne?

Tak, absolutnie! Wszystkie narzędzia URLP są całkowicie bezpłatne bez żadnych ograniczeń. Wspieramy stronę poprzez nieinwazyjne reklamy.

Czy mogę używać narzędzi URLP offline?

Potrzebujesz połączenia z internetem, aby wstępnie załadować stronę, ale całe przetwarzanie odbywa się w Twojej przeglądarce za pomocą JavaScript. Po załadowaniu narzędzia działają bez wysyłania danych na nasze serwery.

Pytania dotyczące narzędzi

Co to jest kodowanie Base64 i kiedy powinienem go używać?

Kodowanie Base64 konwertuje dane binarne do formatu tekstu ASCII. Używaj go podczas przesyłania danych binarnych przez protokoły tekstowe (email, JSON API), osadzania obrazów w HTML/CSS lub przechowywania danych binarnych w formatach tekstowych. Pamiętaj: Base64 to nie szyfrowanie!

Jaka jest różnica między kodowaniem URL a kodowaniem Base64?

Kodowanie URL (kodowanie procentowe) czyni tekst bezpiecznym do użycia w URL-ach, konwertując znaki specjalne do formatu %XX. Base64 konwertuje dowolne dane do formatu tekstowego używając A-Z, a-z, 0-9, + i /. Używaj kodowania URL dla parametrów zapytania, a Base64 do transmisji danych binarnych.

Dlaczego potrzebuję kodowania encji HTML?

Kodowanie encji HTML zapobiega atakom XSS poprzez konwersję znaków specjalnych (<, >, & itp.) na bezpieczne encje (&lt;, &gt;, &amp;). Zawsze używaj go podczas wyświetlania treści generowanych przez użytkowników na stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec lukom w zabezpieczeniach.

Co to jest token JWT i jak go odkodować?

JWT (JSON Web Token) to bezpieczny sposób przesyłania informacji między stronami. Nasz dekoder JWT dzieli token na trzy części (nagłówek, ładunek, podpis) i dekoduje nagłówek i ładunek. Uwaga: To narzędzie nie weryfikuje podpisów - zawsze weryfikuj JWT na swoim serwerze.

Bezpieczeństwo i prywatność

Czy bezpieczne jest używanie tych narzędzi z wrażliwymi danymi?

Tak! Całe przetwarzanie odbywa się w całości w Twojej przeglądarce. Twoje dane nigdy nie opuszczają Twojego urządzenia ani nie są wysyłane na nasze serwery. Jednak unikaj używania wrażliwych tokenów produkcyjnych lub danych uwierzytelniających w środowiskach współdzielonych lub publicznych.

Czy przechowujecie lub logujecie moje dane?

Nie. Ponieważ całe przetwarzanie odbywa się w Twojej przeglądarce za pomocą JavaScript, nigdy nie otrzymujemy, nie przechowujemy ani nie logujemy żadnych danych, które wprowadzasz do naszych narzędzi. Twoja prywatność jest całkowicie chroniona.

Czy mogę używać tych narzędzi do projektów komercyjnych?

Tak! Wszystkie narzędzia URLP są bezpłatne do użytku zarówno w projektach osobistych, jak i komercyjnych bez ograniczeń. Atrybucja nie jest wymagana.

Które przeglądarki są obsługiwane?

Narzędzia URLP działają we wszystkich nowoczesnych przeglądarkach, w tym Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge i Opera. Zalecamy utrzymywanie przeglądarki w aktualnej wersji dla najlepszych wrażeń.

Technical Deep Dive

How does browser-based processing work technically?

When you use a URLP tool, JavaScript code embedded in the webpage performs the encoding or decoding operation. For example, Base64 encoding uses the browser's built-in btoa() function or Buffer API in modern browsers. URL encoding uses encodeURIComponent(). JSON formatting uses JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify(). All these are native browser APIs that execute entirely on your device. No AJAX requests, no WebSockets, no server communication. Just local JavaScript execution. You can verify this by opening your browser's Network tab in Developer Tools and watching that no requests are made when you click "Encode" or "Decode".

Why is Base64 encoding not encryption?

Base64 is encoding, not encryption, because it's easily and instantly reversible without any secret key. Anyone can decode Base64 with freely available tools (including this website). Encryption requires a secret key and uses complex mathematical algorithms (like AES or RSA) that are computationally infeasible to reverse without the key. Base64 simply converts binary data to text using a fixed alphabet (A-Z, a-z, 0-9, +, /). There's no security involved. Never use Base64 alone to protect sensitive data like passwords or API keys. Always use proper encryption first, then optionally Base64 encode the encrypted result if you need text format.

What is the difference between encodeURI and encodeURIComponent in JavaScript?

encodeURIComponent() encodes everything except A-Z, a-z, 0-9, -, _, ., ~, *, (, ). Use it for encoding query parameter values. encodeURI() preserves URL structural characters like :, /, ?, &, =, allowing you to encode an entire URL while keeping it functional. For example, encodeURIComponent("http://example.com?q=test") encodes the colon and slashes, breaking the URL structure. encodeURI() would preserve them. For URLP and most developer use cases, encodeURIComponent() (which our tool uses) is correct because you're encoding individual values, not complete URLs.

Can I process large files with these tools?

URLP tools can handle reasonably large text inputs (up to several megabytes) depending on your device's RAM and browser performance. However, very large files (100MB+) may cause performance issues or browser memory errors since all processing happens in your browser's JavaScript environment. For extremely large files, consider using server-side processing or command-line tools. As a guideline, most text-based data (JSON responses, configuration files, code snippets) works perfectly. Large binary files (videos, high-resolution images) should be processed server-side or with native applications.

What is the difference between Base64 and Base64URL encoding?

Standard Base64 uses the alphabet A-Z, a-z, 0-9, +, / with = for padding. Base64URL (<a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4648.html#section-5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">RFC 4648 Section 5</a>) replaces + with - and / with _ (URL-safe characters) and typically omits padding (=). This makes Base64URL safe for use in URLs, file names, and HTTP headers without additional encoding. JWT tokens use Base64URL encoding. Use standard Base64 for general encoding and Base64URL specifically when the encoded string will appear in a URL or file name. Our Base64 tools use standard Base64, but the decoded result of Base64URL will work correctly since the character sets overlap.

How do I handle non-ASCII characters when encoding?

Non-ASCII characters (accented letters, Chinese, Arabic, emoji) must be converted to UTF-8 bytes before encoding. Modern browsers handle this automatically. When you paste unicode text into our tools, JavaScript's TextEncoder API converts it to UTF-8 bytes before encoding. When decoding, TextDecoder converts UTF-8 bytes back to unicode text. If you see garbled output, the most common issue is encoding/decoding with different character sets (e.g., encoding as ISO-8859-1 but decoding as UTF-8). Always use UTF-8 encoding for maximum compatibility and internationalization support.

What are HTML named entities vs numeric entities?

Named entities use human-readable names: &lt; for <, &gt; for >, &amp; for &, &quot; for ". Numeric entities use character codes: &#60; for <, &#62; for >, &#38; for &. Both produce the same result in browsers. Named entities are limited to predefined characters (about 252 in HTML5), while numeric entities can represent any Unicode character (&#x1F600; for 😀). Our HTML encoder primarily uses named entities for common characters because they're more readable in source code. Numeric entities are used for characters without named equivalents.

Why does my JSON keep failing validation?

The most common JSON errors are: (1) Trailing commas after the last array item or object property. JSON forbids these while JavaScript allows them. (2) Single quotes instead of double quotes. JSON requires double quotes for strings and property names. (3) Unquoted property names like {name: "value"}. JSON requires {"name": "value"}. (4) Comments. JSON has no comment syntax, though some parsers allow them. (5) Undefined, NaN, Infinity values. JSON only supports strings, numbers, booleans, null, arrays, and objects. Use our JSON Formatter to identify the exact error location and get helpful error messages.

Troubleshooting

Why do I get "invalid Base64 string" errors?

Base64 strings must only contain A-Z, a-z, 0-9, +, / and = (for padding). Common causes of invalid Base64 include: (1) Extra whitespace, newlines, or carriage returns. Remove all whitespace. (2) Wrong characters like @ or $ that aren't in the Base64 alphabet. (3) Truncated string. Base64 length must be a multiple of 4 (padding with = makes this true). (4) Accidentally pasted non-Base64 text. (5) Using Base64URL (- and _ characters) with a standard Base64 decoder. Copy only the encoded portion without any surrounding text, remove whitespace, and ensure the string ends properly.

Why does URL encoding sometimes use %20 and sometimes use + for spaces?

There are two URL encoding standards: (1) <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">RFC 3986</a> percent encoding encodes spaces as %20. This is used in URL paths and modern query strings. Our URL Encoder uses this standard. (2) application/x-www-form-urlencoded (form encoding) encodes spaces as +. This is used by HTML forms with GET method. Both are valid, but + is only for form data, while %20 works everywhere. When decoding, most decoders handle both formats. When encoding, use %20 for general URL encoding (our tool) and + specifically for form submissions.

How do I decode a JWT token on my server?

Our JWT decoder is for inspection only. It doesn't verify signatures. For production use, always verify JWT tokens on your server using a proper JWT library: (1) PHP: firebase/php-jwt library with JWT::decode($token, $key, ['HS256']). (2) Node.js: jsonwebtoken library with jwt.verify(token, secret). (3) Python: PyJWT library with jwt.decode(token, secret, algorithms=['HS256']). (4) Java: java-jwt or nimbus-jose-jwt libraries. Verification checks include: (a) signature is valid, (b) token hasn't expired (exp claim), (c) issuer is correct (iss claim), (d) audience matches (aud claim). Never trust a JWT without signature verification.

Can I use these tools in my own application or website?

URLP tools are designed as web-based utilities, not embeddable components or APIs. However, all encoding/decoding functions use standard algorithms you can implement yourself. See our code examples in 7 programming languages on each tool page. For JavaScript-based applications, you can use the same browser APIs our tools use: btoa/atob for Base64, encodeURIComponent/decodeURIComponent for URLs, JSON.stringify/JSON.parse for JSON, etc. For other languages, use the standard library functions shown in our examples. You're welcome to reference our implementations, but please don't iframe or scrape our pages.

Advanced Usage

How do I encode binary files to Base64?

URLP tools work with text input only. To encode binary files (images, PDFs, executables), you have several options: (1) Use command-line: base64 input.png > output.txt (Linux/Mac) or certutil -encode input.pdf output.txt (Windows). (2) Use programming languages: PHP: base64_encode(file_get_contents("file.pdf")), Python: base64.b64encode(open("file.bin", "rb").read()), Node.js: fs.readFileSync("file.dat").toString("base64"). (3) For small files (<1MB), some online tools accept file uploads, but remember uploaded data leaves your device. For maximum privacy with sensitive files, use local command-line or programming language solutions.

What is the performance difference between client-side and server-side encoding?

Client-side (browser-based, like URLP) is faster for small to medium data (up to ~10MB) because there's no network latency. Encoding happens instantly on your CPU. Server-side is better for very large data (100MB+) because servers typically have more RAM and CPU power. Client-side also avoids upload/download time. A 50MB file takes seconds to upload but encodes instantly in your browser. For privacy-sensitive data, client-side is always preferred since data never leaves your device. For automated workflows and very large files, server-side or command-line tools are more appropriate.

How do I handle JWT token expiration?

JWT tokens include an exp (expiration) claim containing a Unix timestamp (seconds since 1970-01-01). Use our JWT Decoder to inspect the exp value. To check if expired, compare the exp timestamp to current time. In JavaScript: if (decoded.exp * 1000 < Date.now()) { /* expired */ }. Most JWT libraries have built-in expiration checking. They'll throw an error when verifying an expired token. For security: (1) Always check expiration server-side during verification. (2) Use short expiration times (15-60 minutes for access tokens). (3) Implement refresh tokens for long-term access. (4) Never extend expiration by modifying the exp claim. That breaks the signature.

What are the security risks of XSS and how does HTML encoding prevent them?

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) occurs when untrusted user input is displayed on a webpage without encoding, allowing malicious users to inject JavaScript code. Example: if you display <script>alert("hacked")</script> from user input without encoding, the script executes. HTML entity encoding converts < to &lt; and > to &gt;, rendering the script as harmless text: &lt;script&gt;alert("hacked")&lt;/script&gt;. Always encode user input before displaying it in HTML. Use context-appropriate encoding: HTML encoding for content, JavaScript encoding for JS strings, URL encoding for href attributes. Never trust client-side encoding alone. Always encode server-side before rendering. Follow OWASP guidelines for comprehensive XSS prevention.

Can I automate these tools with scripts or APIs?

URLP doesn't provide a public API, but you can automate encoding/decoding in your scripts using standard library functions. See our code examples on each tool page for details. For automation: (1) Python: use base64, urllib.parse, html, json modules. (2) JavaScript/Node.js: use Buffer, encodeURIComponent, JSON, he libraries. (3) Bash: use base64, jq, urlencode commands. (4) PHP: use base64_encode/decode, urlencode, htmlspecialchars, json_encode. These native functions are faster and more reliable than web scraping. For batch processing, write simple scripts rather than relying on web tools.

What is the character limit for inputs in URLP tools?

There's no hard character limit enforced by URLP. The limit is your browser's JavaScript memory. Typical browsers can handle: (1) Text inputs up to 10-50MB without issues. (2) Large JSON files up to 100MB if your device has sufficient RAM. (3) Very large Base64 strings (50MB+) may work but could cause slowdowns. If you hit memory limits, your browser will slow down or display "page unresponsive" warnings. For massive data, use command-line tools (base64, jq) or programming language scripts instead of browser-based tools. For 99% of developer use cases (API responses, config files, JWT tokens), URLP handles inputs instantly.

Gotowy, aby zacząć?

Odkryj naszą kolekcję bezpłatnych narzędzi deweloperskich i uprość swój przepływ pracy już dziś.

Zobacz wszystkie narzędzia